On 09/05/2013 09:53 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 05.09.2013 23:32, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 5 September 2013 21:35, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: >>> In a first analysis of this, I noticed that it is impossible to run >>> qemu-sparc64 >>> under gdb (raised fatal signal). >> You probably just need to let the signals go through to >> the target... I noticed that it had a tendency to do lots >> of (presumably safely handled) segfaulting while running; >> didn't look at why this happens. > > After lots of SIGSEGV, the program indeed finishes successfully, > so my report was wrong - SIGSEGV is not a fatal signal for sparc64. > That's interesting - thank you for this information.
It's not just sparc64. That's changed page detection, for determining when to invalidate translation blocks. For self-modifying code, and more. r~
