On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:04:17 +0200 Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 04.09.2013 14:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > > On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:45:44 +0200 > > Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > > > >> For the HMP patch I am waiting on feedback from Igor once he returns > >> from his vacation and, if there are no objections, would like to see > >> that patch go through Luiz' queue since unrelated to s390x. > > > > I don't remember seeing that patch, I was CC'ed? It should be good then :) > > Originally no, but you added a Reviewed-by after I CC'ed you. :) > > Apart from me not being familiar with the HMP infrastructure, I was > wondering if there was a reason why this wasn't done from the start. > > So we don't have some only-new-QMP-commands policy Not sure what you meant, but what is usually not accepted are new HMP-only commands. > and people are > encouraged to implement an HMP command when they do a QMP command? If the new command makes sense in HMP, yes they're.
