On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our > >> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. > >> > > >> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > >> > ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's > >> > existence > >> > in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic" > > More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find > anything that's utterly broken in the design". > > And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin > pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". > > Paolo
isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that. NACK > > If we feel there's need to give libvirt a way to do > > introspection into QEMU bugs, let's architect one. > > Randomly renaming devices in the vain hope it's > > the last major bug is not it.
