Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our >> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. >> > >> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> >> > ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence >> > in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic"
More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find anything that's utterly broken in the design". And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". Paolo > If we feel there's need to give libvirt a way to do > introspection into QEMU bugs, let's architect one. > Randomly renaming devices in the vain hope it's > the last major bug is not it.
