Il 25/07/2013 11:38, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > On 25 July 2013 10:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > wrote: >> That's fine, I know you can fix stuff :-) I'm just really annoyed that >> upstream qemu remained broken for so long (and still is) while the whole >> thing derailed into a mostly pointless discussion on endianness and >> nobody (including Alexey) hollered loud enough that the breakage was >> fairly extensive > > I think that for the minor architectures we just have to make > sure that we do yell loudly when things are broken, because > the nature of things is that people won't notice. Maybe we should > have a qemu-urgent list to parallel qemu-trivial for compile > fixes, reversions of bad breakage, etc, to try to keep them > out of the general noise ?
My impression was that Alexey was fine with working temporarily on an older version of QEMU. So reverting the patches would have meant more work for everyone. Paolo
