On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 10:40 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > In any case, let me reinforce point 6 above. The patches were not > reverted because nobody posted the patches to do so. Until someone > does > so, it is basically Anthony's call. If he trusts people to fix the > whole thing, he has no reason to revert anything. My track record of > fixing mess is probably better than my track record of not causing it, > so he didn't revert it.
That's fine, I know you can fix stuff :-) I'm just really annoyed that upstream qemu remained broken for so long (and still is) while the whole thing derailed into a mostly pointless discussion on endianness and nobody (including Alexey) hollered loud enough that the breakage was fairly extensive (BTW. The EHCI problem doesn't seem limited to SLOF, from what I remember of what Alexey showed me today, the Linux EHCI driver also segfaults qemu). Cheers, Ben.
