On 06/20/2013 01:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 19/06/2013 10:01, Wanlong Gao ha scritto: >> On 06/19/2013 04:19 AM, Bandan Das wrote: >>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:20:37AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> Also, please use QemuOpts instead of yet another homegrown parser. >>>>> Eduardo, I think you had the most recent attempt to convert -numa to >>>>> QemuOpts? >>>> >>>> I had one, but I believe it is more complex than it should have been. I >>>> was creating a "numa-node" config section while keeping "-numa" just for >>>> compatbility, but I don't think we really need to do that. >>> >>> Ah, I was working on an update to Eduardo's earlier proposals for multiple >>> CPU ranges >>> and part of the change was to convert to QemuOpts. >>> >>> Probably needs more testing but posted it anyway since we are already >>> discussing this : >>> [PATCH v3] vl.c: Support multiple CPU ranges on -numa option >>> (hasn't shown up in the archives yet) >> >> Here is the archive: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/217491 >> >> So, are you all ACK with this? And we are not considering compatible thing >> by using >> "cpu" instead of "cpus" here? > > No; as Eduardo pointed out, the "cpus" must be kept. But apart from > that, picking up Bandan's patch in v2 of this series should be fine.
Got it, thank you. Regards, Wanlong Gao > > Paolo > >
