Il 19/06/2013 10:01, Wanlong Gao ha scritto: > On 06/19/2013 04:19 AM, Bandan Das wrote: >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:20:37AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> [...] >>>> Also, please use QemuOpts instead of yet another homegrown parser. >>>> Eduardo, I think you had the most recent attempt to convert -numa to >>>> QemuOpts? >>> >>> I had one, but I believe it is more complex than it should have been. I >>> was creating a "numa-node" config section while keeping "-numa" just for >>> compatbility, but I don't think we really need to do that. >> >> Ah, I was working on an update to Eduardo's earlier proposals for multiple >> CPU ranges >> and part of the change was to convert to QemuOpts. >> >> Probably needs more testing but posted it anyway since we are already >> discussing this : >> [PATCH v3] vl.c: Support multiple CPU ranges on -numa option >> (hasn't shown up in the archives yet) > > Here is the archive: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/217491 > > So, are you all ACK with this? And we are not considering compatible thing by > using > "cpu" instead of "cpus" here?
No; as Eduardo pointed out, the "cpus" must be kept. But apart from that, picking up Bandan's patch in v2 of this series should be fine. Paolo
