mdroth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 01:36:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Would this make sense for -stable? Impact is modest: fix a rather >> obscure feature of x86 targets on bigendian hosts, and improve error >> messages around it). On the other hand, the patches look pretty safe to >> me. > > 5/6 was certainly a good candidate. I was going to cherry-pick it but > I agree the other patches looked safe to I went ahead and applied the > series: > > https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/commits/stable-1.5-staging
Thanks!
