Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 2 May 2013 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: >> As it is, patchwork is full of patches that were already reviewed and >> merged, all my scripts that were filtering and sorting patches are also >> useless, and I get to wade through each patch for the second time. > > You need to fix patchwork to have some conception of a > patch series. Then you can just select the whole series > which is the pull request and say "ignore this" and you're > done. Any patch-handling tool that doesn't let you operate > at the level of a complete series is always going to mean > you're doing huge amounts of busywork sometimes.
patches solves this problem. It just requires someone to write a bridge that updates patchwork based on the information that patches mines. > I don't particularly object to suggesting that pullreq > patches are all tagged 'PULL'; I don't think it's very > likely that you'll get 100% consistency out of everybody > though. Ack. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > -- PMM
