Il 11/04/2013 17:18, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: > First of all, this whole argument should not even exist for the > following reason: > > Page registrations are supposed to be *rare* - once a page is > registered, it is registered for life.
Uh-oh. That changes things a lot. We do not even need to benchmark the various chunk sizes. > Third, this means that optimizing this protocol would not be helpful > and that we should follow the "keep it simple" approach because > during steady-state phase of the migration most of the pages should > have already been registered. Ok, let's keep it simple. The only two things we need are: 1) remove the patch to disable is_dup_page 2) rename the transport to "x-rdma" (just in migration.c) Both things together let us keep it safe for a release or two. Let's merge this thing. Paolo
