On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:11:48PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> 于 2013-3-4 21:02, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:51:53AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote: > 于 2013-2-28 
> >0:22, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> >>>Am 27.02.2013 um 17:04 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >>>>Wenchao Xia <xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>>>Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> >>>>>---
> >>>>>  block.c               |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  include/block/block.h |    2 ++
> >>>>>  savevm.c              |   22 ----------------------
> >>>>>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>Perhaps savevm.c isn't the best home for snapshot stuff, but I don't
> >>>>like it in block.c any better.  block.c is already unwieldy, and I'd
> >>>>like us to try limiting it to core block stuff.
> >>>>
> >>>>Kevin, Stefan, any ideas?
> >>>
> >>>Take some more snapshot related functions from block.c and move them to
> >>>block/snapshot.c?
> >>>
> >>>Kevin
> >>>
> >>Hi, Stefan
> >>   Do you also agree about adding new file block/snapshot.c?
> >
> >Yes, I agree.
> >
> >Stefan
> >
> great. Also there are some other functions such as image info
> collecting, do you think new file block/misc.c is suitable
> to store those functions there?

As discussed on IRC, it's fine by me.  If a better way to organize these
functions becomes clear in the future they can be moved.

Stefan

Reply via email to