This is on top of my "[PATCH v2 0/8] -boot and -no-fd-bootchk fixes". Since I need to respin my series anyway, I can include your patch in the respin.
Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes: > They set the boot device via fw_cfg, which is then translated to a boot > path of "hd" or "cd" in OpenBIOS. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> > Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > Cc: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> > Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org > --- > tests/Makefile | 2 ++ > tests/boot-order-test.c | 66 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 Dateien geändert, 67 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-) > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile > index 1305642..f84d466 100644 > --- a/tests/Makefile > +++ b/tests/Makefile > @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ gcov-files-sparc-y += hw/m48t59.c > gcov-files-sparc64-y += hw/m48t59.c > check-qtest-arm-y = tests/tmp105-test$(EXESUF) > gcov-files-arm-y += hw/tmp105.c > +check-qtest-ppc-y += tests/boot-order-test$(EXESUF) > +check-qtest-ppc64-y += tests/boot-order-test$(EXESUF) > > GENERATED_HEADERS += tests/test-qapi-types.h tests/test-qapi-visit.h > tests/test-qmp-commands.h > > diff --git a/tests/boot-order-test.c b/tests/boot-order-test.c > index 60412ad..84dd694 100644 > --- a/tests/boot-order-test.c > +++ b/tests/boot-order-test.c > @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ > * Covers only PC. Better than nothing. Improvements welcome. > */ Comment is no longer correct. Feel free to drop it entirely. > > +#include <string.h> > #include <glib.h> > #include "libqtest.h" > +#include "qemu/bswap.h" > > static void test_cmos_byte(int reg, int expected) > { > @@ -61,11 +63,73 @@ static void test_pc_boot_order(void) > 0, 0x02, 0x30, 0x12); > } > > +#define G3BEIGE_CFG_ADDR 0xf0000510 > +#define MAC99_CFG_ADDR 0xf0000510 > + > +#define NO_QEMU_PROTOS > +#include "hw/fw_cfg.h" > +#undef NO_QEMU_PROTOS Looks like fw_cfg.h should be split up. Out of this patch's scope. > + > +static void powermac_fw_cfg_read(bool newworld, uint16_t cmd, > + uint8_t *buf, unsigned int len) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > + > + writew(newworld ? MAC99_CFG_ADDR : G3BEIGE_CFG_ADDR, cmd); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > + buf[i] = readb((newworld ? MAC99_CFG_ADDR : G3BEIGE_CFG_ADDR) + 2); > + } > +} More general than necessary (readw() would do), but that's okay. > + > +static uint16_t powermac_fw_cfg_read16(bool newworld, uint16_t cmd) > +{ > + uint16_t value; > + > + powermac_fw_cfg_read(newworld, cmd, (uint8_t *)&value, sizeof(value)); > + return le16_to_cpu(value); > +} > + > +static void test_powermac_with_args(bool newworld, const char *extra_args, > + uint16_t expected_boot, > + uint16_t expected_reboot) > +{ > + char *args = g_strdup_printf("-nodefaults -display none -machine %s %s", > + newworld ? "mac99" : "g3beige", extra_args); > + uint16_t actual; > + qtest_start(args); > + actual = powermac_fw_cfg_read16(newworld, FW_CFG_BOOT_DEVICE); > + g_assert_cmphex(actual, ==, expected_boot); > + qmp("{ 'execute': 'system_reset' }"); > + actual = powermac_fw_cfg_read16(newworld, FW_CFG_BOOT_DEVICE); > + g_assert_cmphex(actual, ==, expected_reboot); > + qtest_quit(global_qtest); > + g_free(args); > +} > + > +static void test_powermac_boot_order(void) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > + bool newworld = (i == 1); > + > + test_powermac_with_args(newworld, "", 'c', 'c'); > + test_powermac_with_args(newworld, "-boot c", 'c', 'c'); > + test_powermac_with_args(newworld, "-boot d", 'd', 'd'); Doesn't test -boot once. Tolerable, because test_pc_boot_order() tests it, and the only machine-specific part is the boot set handler. Hmm, test_powermac_with_args() is prepared for -boot once testing. Throw in "-boot once=d,order=c"? > + } > +} > + > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > + const char *arch = qtest_get_arch(); > + > g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL); > > - qtest_add_func("boot-order/pc", test_pc_boot_order); > + if (strcmp(arch, "i386") == 0 || strcmp(arch, "x86_64") == 0) { > + qtest_add_func("boot-order/pc", test_pc_boot_order); > + } else if (strcmp(arch, "ppc") == 0 || strcmp(arch, "ppc64") == 0) { > + qtest_add_func("boot-order/powermac", test_powermac_boot_order); > + } > > return g_test_run(); > } If you don't want to respin, I can take this patch as is, and fix up the bogus comment in my tree.