On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:33:04AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Vadim Rozenfeld <vroze...@redhat.com> writes: > > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> Is it really > >> > that bad that the config space size changed? Why it has this effect? > > Because in this case it's hard to distinguish between resource's > > corruption and HW update. > > But it's also true that if we'd incremented revid you'd have the same > failure in this case, right?
We'd also break all linux guests, and maybe more. -- MST
