Vadim Rozenfeld <vroze...@redhat.com> writes: > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:58 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:38PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Is it really >> > that bad that the config space size changed? Why it has this effect? > Because in this case it's hard to distinguish between resource's > corruption and HW update.
But it's also true that if we'd incremented revid you'd have the same failure in this case, right? Cheers, Rusty.
