Il 05/02/2013 14:20, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >> > We could have a "hw/socks" directory for devices which are pure >> > containers :-) > I'd surely prefer hw/socs/ over hw/socks/ ;) but my point is why would > we want to mix arm and sh4 SoCs (with a clear dependency on $arch) > rather than putting them into hw/$arch proper. > > As Paolo points out, this is (once again) discussing the strictness of > your sayings, in this case 'no devices in hw/$arch' (pseudo-quote).
I agree that devices referring to CPUState should stay in hw/$ARCH. Paolo
