On 5 February 2013 12:58, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 05/02/2013 12:06, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> Am 04.02.2013 22:23, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> So where would you like a tegra2.c SoC device/object to live?
>> It depends on ARMCPU and is thus fo me a clear candidate for hw/arm/,
>> among boards such as ac100.c, kaen.c, ...
>
> I think we agree that almost all of it would be in hw/i2c/tegra2_i2c.c,
> hw/sd/tegra2_sd.c, hw/misc/tegra2_whatever.c.  If you need a device just
> because you're developing it with QOM composition, then the device could
> go in hw/arm/tegra2.c together with the board description.  As they say,
> the exception that confirms the rule.

We could have a "hw/socks" directory for devices which are pure
containers :-)

-- PMM

Reply via email to