On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> [Thread hijack, dropping cc: qemu-trivial, qemu-ppc]
>
> Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes:
>
>> Am 14.01.2013 13:19, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>>> Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes:
> [...]
>>>> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
>>>> index 351b88c..03e6f24 100644
>>>> --- a/qom/object.c
>>>> +++ b/qom/object.c
>>>> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ gchar *object_get_canonical_path(Object *obj)
>>>> return newpath;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -Object *object_resolve_path_component(Object *parent, gchar *part)
>>>> +Object *object_resolve_path_component(Object *parent, const gchar *part)
>>>> {
>>>> ObjectProperty *prop = object_property_find(parent, part, NULL);
>>>> if (prop == NULL) {
>>>
>>> Unrelated: do we really want to go along with glib's basic type typedef
>>> silliness?
>>
>> Elsewhere I have adopted the exact GLib signature since typedefs can be
>> changed at any time. In particular the GCompareFunc using gconstpointer,
>> gint, etc. Not saying I find their GLib usage useful.
>
> No, these typedefs cannot be changed.
>
> Firstly, their exact definitions are documented[*], therefore can be
> relied on.
>
> Secondly, mountains of code rely on the exact definitions, and would
> break left and right if they were changed.
>
> They're a textbook example of a perfectly useless pseudo-abstraction.
CONST, WORD, PWORD, DWORD, FLOAT etc. in a certain platform...
>
> [...]
>
>
> [*] http://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Basic-Types.html
>
