On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:39:40 +0000 Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> wrote:
> > > > but it would silently fail if the feature is never negotiated (as > > > > you said above). > > > > > > Why don't we raise the error when we query the values? > > > > Hmm, that's a good idea. > > > > Only small nit is that, today old stats will remain available to be queried > > even > > if you disable the timer. If we do what you suggest, old stats won't be > > available if the module is unloaded (well, I *guess* the guest will unset > > the > > feature bit on module removal). > > What is the problem with that? It would be no problem to simulate the > old behavior, but why do you want that? I actually just thought that it's a nice to have.
