On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:47:24 -0600 mdroth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 11:55:16AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:39:32 +0900 > > Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama...@hitachi.com> wrote: > > > > > Adds sample hook scripts for --fsfreeze-hook option of qemu-ga. > > > - fsfreeze-hook : execute scripts in fsfreeze-hook.d/ > > > - fsfreeze-hook.d/mysql-flush.sh.sample : quiesce MySQL before snapshot > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama...@hitachi.com> > > > --- > > > .gitignore | 1 > > > Makefile | 2 - > > > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 33 ++++++++++++ > > > .../fsfreeze-hook.d/mysql-flush.sh.sample | 55 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > create mode 100755 scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > > > create mode 100755 > > > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook.d/mysql-flush.sh.sample > > > > > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > > > index bd6ba1c..286822d 100644 > > > --- a/.gitignore > > > +++ b/.gitignore > > > @@ -93,3 +93,4 @@ cscope.* > > > tags > > > TAGS > > > *~ > > > +!scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook.d > > > > Why? Do we expect to have *~ files in there? > > I think default vim configurations will copy <file> to <file>~ prior to > editing. But should that be tracked by git specifically in that dir? > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > > index 9ecbcbb..466dcd7 100644 > > > --- a/Makefile > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ clean: > > > # avoid old build problems by removing potentially incorrect old files > > > rm -f config.mak op-i386.h opc-i386.h gen-op-i386.h op-arm.h opc-arm.h > > > gen-op-arm.h > > > rm -f qemu-options.def > > > - find . -name '*.[od]' -exec rm -f {} + > > > + find . -name '*.[od]' -type f -exec rm -f {} + > > > > What does this change have to do with this patch? > > Looks like it'll try (and fail, due to lack of -r option to rm) to > delete the fsfreeze-hook.d directory on `make clean`. For in-tree builds > at least. I can't see it, but well, I don't want to hold this patch for minor things either... It looks good for me apart from these two nitpicks.