Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: >> Am 05.10.2012 04:10, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> >>> Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> The hassle and compile time overhead of maintaining both 32-bit and >>>> 64-bit >>>> capable source isn't worth the tiny performance advantage which is seen >>>> on >>>> a minority of configurations. Switch to compiling libhw only once, with >>>> target_phys_addr_t unconditionally typedefed to uint64_t. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Applied. Thanks. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Anthony Liguori >>> >> >> >> In a next step, we can remove libhw completely: >> >> All files from libhw/hw/*.o could as well be generated in hw/*.o, >> and hw-obj should become common-obj. >> >> Or is there still a reason why libhw is needed? > > At least the trivial change to Makefile.objs does not work.
It's a little more complicated than that but not that hard. I just sent a patch. Regards, Anthony Liguori > >> >> Regards >> >> Stefan W. >>
