On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > Am 05.10.2012 04:10, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > >> Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> The hassle and compile time overhead of maintaining both 32-bit and >>> 64-bit >>> capable source isn't worth the tiny performance advantage which is seen >>> on >>> a minority of configurations. Switch to compiling libhw only once, with >>> target_phys_addr_t unconditionally typedefed to uint64_t. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> >> >> Applied. Thanks. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori >> > > > In a next step, we can remove libhw completely: > > All files from libhw/hw/*.o could as well be generated in hw/*.o, > and hw-obj should become common-obj. > > Or is there still a reason why libhw is needed?
At least the trivial change to Makefile.objs does not work. > > Regards > > Stefan W. >
