On 10/04/2012 12:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 October 2012 11:15, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 10/04/2012 10:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> I'd favour just moving everything to 64 bits (the remaining >>> 32 bit targets are: cris, lm32, m68k, microblaze, or32, sh4, unicore32, >>> xtensa). However it does require some review of devices to check that >>> they're not using target_phys_addr_t when they meant uint32_t [eg >>> in registers for DMA devices] or relying on 32 bit wraparound. >> >> I posted a patch. I did no review, the cost/benefit tradeoff is >> horrible IMO, especially with me not knowing the details. If something >> breaks, git bisect will save the day. > > It might be nice to cc the maintainers of the affected target archs > and suggest that they at least do a quick smoke test :-)
Yes, will do. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
