Am 04.09.2012 20:12, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Am 04.09.2012 19:57, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 4 September 2012 18:37, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote:
Report from smatch:
mcf5206.c:384 m5206_mbar_readb(7) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
mcf5206.c:403 m5206_mbar_readw(8) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
mcf5206.c:427 m5206_mbar_readl(8) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
mcf5206.c:451 m5206_mbar_writeb(9) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
mcf5206.c:475 m5206_mbar_writew(9) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
mcf5206.c:503 m5206_mbar_writel(9) error: buffer overflow
'm5206_mbar_width' 128 <= 128
m5206_mbar_width has 0x80 elements and supports 0 <= offset < 0x200.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>
Checked against the data sheet -- last documented register is at
offset $1F0,
so correcting the offset check rather than the array length is the
correct
fix.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
-- PMM
Then m5206_mbar_width should be shortened to 124 elements
(0x1f0 / 4) _and_ the offset check needs a correction.
-- sw
Sorry, 125 elements, of course. Or are there undocumented
registers at 0x1f4, 0x1f8 and 0x1fc?
- sw
