On 24 August 2012 14:39, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 24/08/2012 09:19, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>> > Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on >>> > the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and >>> > I would prefer to not have it merged that easily. >> Adding a new command line option certainly looks like a new >> feature rather than a bug fix to me, and really shouldn't >> be going in at this point in the release cycle in my opinion. >> I would suggest that these commits should all be reverted. > > Patches 2 and 4 can stay, maybe 3 too.
I tend to be pretty conservative about what I thought ought to go in during a freeze, and I also think it's much clearer to do a clean revert of everything and then go through the process properly from a fresh start. -- PMM
