On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote: >>> >>>> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can >>>> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987) >>>> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM) >>>> >>>> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=15654 >>>> >>>> The patches are all independent, except that the documentation part >>>> of patch 5 (vga) adds onto patch 4 (retrace=) changes. >>> >>> [..snip..] >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >> >> Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on >> the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and >> I would prefer to not have it merged that easily. >> > > Where's the process documented? As for patch 6 i confess i haven't paid > enough attention and was under impression that this set was mainly about > adjusting the comment about mov crN behavior. >
See http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2 e.g. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
