Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> - I guess there is same reasy why you want to split the device state, >>>>> it could be on the other series where I haven't read it though. >>> >>> So this is exactly what I have done in the SSI. Correct me if I am >>> wrong but it is the same setup as PCI where the VMSTATE_PCI_DEVICE >>> (VMSTATE_SSI_SLAVE in my case) is the first field. All I need to do is >>> bump version numbers? >> >> I think so. What boards normally use SSI? >> > > Tracing all the calls to ssi_create_bus() at the moment we have > stellaris, spitz, highbank, gumstix, mainstone, z2, tosa & collie.
Then we can change it without regards to backwards compatibility (migration is still not working correctly there), so backwards compatibility is the less of the troubles. Later, Juan.
