Am 09.08.2012 15:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 09/08/2012 14:52, ronnie sahlberg ha scritto:
guest uses noop right now. Disk Host is nexentastor running open solaris. I
use libiscsi right now so the disks are not visible in both cases
(virtio-blk and virtio-scsi) to the host right now.
And if you mount the disks locally on the host using open-iscsi, and
access them as /dev/sg* from qemu, what performance do you get?
Good question.
virtio-blk would first go to scsi emulation and then call out to
block/iscsi.c to translate back to scsi commands to send to libiscsi
while virtio-scsi (I think) would treat libiscsi as a generic scsi
passthrough device. I.e. all commands just go straight through
bdrv_aio_ioctl(SG_IO)
I think he's not using scsi-block or scsi-generic, because 1.0 libiscsi
didn't support that.
scsi-generic would indeed incur some overhead because it does not do
scatter/gather I/O directly, but scsi-hd/scsi-block do not have this
overhead. In any case, that should be visible through the output of
perf if it is significant.
Thanks for your help and replies. I'm a little bit lost on all these
comments. So what to check / do next?
Stefan
