Hi, > [ lots of interesting background info snipped ]
> It's all doable, it's also a bit tricky, potentially quite a bit of > code, new KVM/qemu interfaces, etc... for a problem that's going to be a > non-issue pretty much 99.9% of the time :-) We still need to address it, > but I haven't convinced myself yet that I have come up with the best > solution :-) Yea, sure, it's in the "nice-to-have" not "must-have" category. And adding complex code which almost never actually runs needs some care indeed. Not having that for the initial merge is perfectly fine with me, just wanted to know what dragons might be lurking there ;) Oh, and: Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> cheers, Gerd
