On 16 May 2012 14:08, Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> > > Use g_malloc/g_free in place of malloc/free. > > Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com> > --- > softmmu-semi.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/softmmu-semi.h b/softmmu-semi.h > index 648cb95..996e0f7 100644 > --- a/softmmu-semi.h > +++ b/softmmu-semi.h > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void *softmmu_lock_user(CPUArchState *env, uint32_t > addr, uint32_t len, > { > uint8_t *p; > /* TODO: Make this something that isn't fixed size. */ > - p = malloc(len); > + p = g_malloc(len); > if (copy) > cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, addr, p, len, 0); > return p;
Nak. This function is called with a length passed from the guest, so killing qemu if the length is too large is a bad idea. The callers should handle it returning NULL on failure. (Most of them do already, if any do not that's a bug.) The bug in this function is passing NULL to cpu_memory_rw_debug(). -- PMM