On 16 May 2012 14:08, Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote:
> From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
>
> Use g_malloc/g_free in place of malloc/free.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  softmmu-semi.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu-semi.h b/softmmu-semi.h
> index 648cb95..996e0f7 100644
> --- a/softmmu-semi.h
> +++ b/softmmu-semi.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void *softmmu_lock_user(CPUArchState *env, uint32_t 
> addr, uint32_t len,
>  {
>     uint8_t *p;
>     /* TODO: Make this something that isn't fixed size.  */
> -    p = malloc(len);
> +    p = g_malloc(len);
>     if (copy)
>         cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, addr, p, len, 0);
>     return p;

Nak. This function is called with a length passed from the guest, so
killing qemu if the length is too large is a bad idea. The callers
should handle it returning NULL on failure. (Most of them do already,
if any do not that's a bug.) The bug in this function is passing
NULL to cpu_memory_rw_debug().

-- PMM

Reply via email to