From: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>

Use g_malloc/g_free in place of malloc/free.

Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyer...@redhat.com>
---
 softmmu-semi.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/softmmu-semi.h b/softmmu-semi.h
index 648cb95..996e0f7 100644
--- a/softmmu-semi.h
+++ b/softmmu-semi.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void *softmmu_lock_user(CPUArchState *env, uint32_t 
addr, uint32_t len,
 {
     uint8_t *p;
     /* TODO: Make this something that isn't fixed size.  */
-    p = malloc(len);
+    p = g_malloc(len);
     if (copy)
         cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, addr, p, len, 0);
     return p;
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static char *softmmu_lock_user_string(CPUArchState *env, 
uint32_t addr)
     char *s;
     uint8_t c;
     /* TODO: Make this something that isn't fixed size.  */
-    s = p = malloc(1024);
+    s = p = g_malloc(1024);
     do {
         cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, addr, &c, 1, 0);
         addr++;
@@ -65,6 +65,6 @@ static void softmmu_unlock_user(CPUArchState *env, void *p, 
target_ulong addr,
 {
     if (len)
         cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, addr, p, len, 1);
-    free(p);
+    g_free(p);
 }
 #define unlock_user(s, args, len) softmmu_unlock_user(env, s, args, len)
-- 
1.7.10.2.520.g6a4a482


Reply via email to