Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes:
[...] >> We don't mention the Link: or Message-Id: tags. > > Yes, but should it go into code-provenance.rst or > submitting-a-patch.rst? > > You asked for guidance on use of "Message-Id:" in your review of v2. I > understand the practice, and can write guidance, but I wanted to get > this out before my vacation next week, so I left it for later, as > mentioned in the cover letter. > > How do we use "Link:"? What about "Closes:"? I didn't address this in v4. I could try in a later revision, but I'd prefer to do it on top. [...]
