On 21/05/2025 22:03, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 08:43:37AM +0000, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
> [...]
>>> After this change, sample output (default, no "-a" specified):
>>>
>>>     Status: postcopy-active
>>>     Time (ms): total=40504, setup=14, down=145
>>>     RAM info:
>>>       Bandwidth (mbps): 6102.65
>>>       Sizes (KB): psize=4, total=16777992
>>>         transferred=37673019, remain=2136404,
>>>         precopy=3, multifd=26108780, postcopy=11563855
>>>       Pages: normal=9394288, zero=600672, rate_per_sec=185875
>>>       Others: dirty_syncs=3, dirty_pages_rate=278378, postcopy_req=4078
>>
>> (Feel free to ignore my comment if you have reached a consensus.)
>>
>> Putting multiple fields in one line is a true need for human reading?
> 
> It definitely helps me but I agree that can be subjective.  So I'm happy to
> collect opinions.
> 
> So my above layout was trying to leverage more on screens where width is
> bigger than the height (which is pretty much the default).
> 
>> I don't have confident to reorg them so I feed this request to the AI,
>> he suggested something like this:
>>
>> Migration Status:
>>     Status: completed
>>
>> Time Statistics:
>>     Setup: 15 ms
>>     Downtime: 76 ms
>>     Total: 122952 ms
>> RAM Transfer:
>>     Throughput: 8717.68 mbps
>>     Page Size: 4 KB
>>     Transferred:
>>       Total: 130825923 KB
>>       Precopied: 15 KB
>>       Postcopied: 13691151 KB
>>       Multifd: 117134260 KB
>>     Remaining: 0 KB
>>     Total RAM: 16777992 KB
>> Page Statistics:
>>     Normal Pages: 32622225
>>     Zero Pages: 0
>>     Duplicate Pages: 997263
>>     Transfer Page Rate: 169431
>>     Dirty Page Rate: 1234
>>     Dirty Syncs: 10
> 
> I would trust you more than the AI, so feel free to share your opinion next
> time (which won't hurt if it was a result of AI discussions, but only which
> you agreed on :).

Thank you.

Actually the AI does much better than me in any aspects.
I have decided to surrender to AI:) https://syaro.io/1ksu/

> 
> It's already in a pull, let's revisit whenever necessary.  Thanks for the
> input!

Sounds good. Let’s proceed with the this and observe feedback from the 
end-uers..

Thanks
Zhijian

Reply via email to