On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 16:56, Nabih Estefan <nabiheste...@google.com> wrote:
>
> v2: used ldl_le_p and lduw_l_p instead of memcpy as per upstream
> suggestion.
>
> ```
> ../tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c:106:5: runtime error: load of misaligned address 
> 0x562040be8e33 for type 'uint32_t', which requires 4 byte alignment
> ```
> Instead of straight casting the uint8_t array, we use memcpy to assure
> alignment is correct against uint32_t and uint16_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nabih Estefan <nabiheste...@google.com>
> ---
>  tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c b/tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c
> index f40c4ec4cd..2e0bb58617 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/libqos/igb.c
> @@ -104,10 +104,10 @@ static void igb_pci_start_hw(QOSGraphObject *obj)
>      e1000e_macreg_write(&d->e1000e, E1000_RDT(0), 0);
>      e1000e_macreg_write(&d->e1000e, E1000_RDH(0), 0);
>      e1000e_macreg_write(&d->e1000e, E1000_RA,
> -                        le32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t *)address));
> +                        ldl_le_p((uint32_t *)address));
>      e1000e_macreg_write(&d->e1000e, E1000_RA + 4,
>                          E1000_RAH_AV | E1000_RAH_POOL_1 |
> -                        le16_to_cpu(*(uint16_t *)(address + 4)));
> +                        lduw_le_p((uint16_t *)(address + 4)));

ldl_le_p() etc take a 'void *' -- the casts here should not be
necessary.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to