On 3/21/25 10:26, Jamin Lin wrote:
The AST2700 CPU, based on the Cortex-A35, is a 64-bit processor, and its DRAM
address space is also 64-bit. To support future AST2700 updates, the source
hash buffer address data type is being updated to 64-bit.

Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_...@aspeedtech.com>
---
  hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c | 8 +++++---
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c b/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
index 4bcf6ed074..9771d6e490 100644
--- a/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
+++ b/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
      uint32_t sg_addr = 0;
      uint32_t pad_offset;
      uint32_t len = 0;
-    uint32_t src = 0;
+    uint64_t src = 0;
      void *haddr;
      hwaddr plen;
      int i;
@@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
                  break;
              }
- src = s->regs[R_HASH_SRC] + (i * SG_LIST_ENTRY_SIZE);
+            src = deposit64(src, 0, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC]);

I would introduce an helper routine to return the hash 'src' address.
More changes are expected in the following patches.

Why is the initial hash 'src' address assigned in the loop ? This
could done before looping on the scatter-gather list elements.

Also should this address be aligned to some size ?


Thanks,

C.




+            src += i * SG_LIST_ENTRY_SIZE;
len = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, src,
                                         MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
@@ -212,8 +213,9 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
          }
      } else {
          plen = s->regs[R_HASH_SRC_LEN];
+        src = deposit64(src, 0, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC]);
- haddr = address_space_map(&s->dram_as, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC],
+        haddr = address_space_map(&s->dram_as, src,
                                    &plen, false, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
          if (haddr == NULL) {
              qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: qcrypto failed\n", __func__);


Reply via email to