On 3/21/25 10:26, Jamin Lin wrote:
According to the AST2700 design, the data source address is 64-bit, with
R_HASH_SRC_HI storing bits [63:32] and R_HASH_SRC storing bits [31:0].

Similarly, the digest address is 64-bit, with R_HASH_DEST_HI storing bits
[63:32] and R_HASH_DEST storing bits [31:0].

Ideally, sg_addr should be 64-bit for the AST2700, using the following program
to obtain the 64-bit sg_addr and convert it to a DRAM offset:

```
sg_addr = deposit64(sg_addr, 32, 32,
                     address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, src + SG_LIST_ADDR_SIZE,
                                          MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
sg_addr -= 0x400000000;
```

I don't think the code extract above is useful.

To maintain compatibility with older SoCs such as the AST2600, the AST2700 HW
HACE controllers automatically set bit 34 of the 64-bit sg_addr.

I suppose that's what bits [30:28] of the first word of the scatter-gather entry
are for ?

As a result,
the firmware only needs to provide a 32-bit sg_addr containing bits [31:0].
This is sufficient for the AST2700, as it uses a DRAM offset rather than a DRAM
address.

yes the HACE model can use a relative address because the DRAM memory
region is directly available. There is no need to construct a physical
address.

Introduce a has_dma64 class attribute and set it to true for the AST2700.

Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_...@aspeedtech.com>
---
  include/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.h |  1 +
  hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c         | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.h b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.h
index a4479bd383..58fb66009a 100644
--- a/include/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.h
+++ b/include/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct AspeedHACEClass {
      uint32_t src_hi_mask;
      uint32_t dest_hi_mask;
      uint32_t key_hi_mask;
+    bool has_dma64;
  };
#endif /* ASPEED_HACE_H */
diff --git a/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c b/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
index 51c6523fab..8f333fc97e 100644
--- a/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
+++ b/hw/misc/aspeed_hace.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static bool has_padding(AspeedHACEState *s, struct iovec 
*iov,
  static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, bool sg_mode,
                                bool acc_mode)
  {
+    AspeedHACEClass *ahc = ASPEED_HACE_GET_CLASS(s);
      bool sg_acc_mode_final_request = false;
      g_autofree uint8_t *digest_buf = NULL;
      struct iovec iov[ASPEED_HACE_MAX_SG];
@@ -182,6 +183,9 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
              }
src = deposit64(src, 0, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC]);
+            if (ahc->has_dma64) {
+                src = deposit64(src, 32, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC_HI]);
+            }

That's where a little helper would be nice to have.

              src += i * SG_LIST_ENTRY_SIZE;
len = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, src,
@@ -190,6 +194,21 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int 
algo, bool sg_mode,
              sg_addr = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, src + 
SG_LIST_LEN_SIZE,
                                             MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
              sg_addr &= SG_LIST_ADDR_MASK;
+            /*
+             * Ideally, sg_addr should be 64-bit for the AST2700, using the
+             * following program to obtain the 64-bit sg_addr and convert it
+             * to a DRAM offset:
+             * sg_addr = deposit64(sg_addr, 32, 32,
+             *      address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, src + SG_ADDR_LEN_SIZE,
+             *                           MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
+             * sg_addr -= 0x400000000;
+             *

I don't think the above comment is useful. Please keep the one below.

+             * To maintain compatibility with older SoCs such as the AST2600,
+             * the AST2700 HW automatically set bit 34 of the 64-bit sg_addr.
+             * As a result, the firmware only needs to provide a 32-bit sg_addr
+             * containing bits [31:0]. This is sufficient for the AST2700, as
+             * it uses a DRAM offset rather than a DRAM address.
+             */

The SG_LIST_ADDR_MASK needs an update though. AFAICT, it's bigger on AST2700.


Thanks,

C.



              plen = len & SG_LIST_LEN_MASK;
              haddr = address_space_map(&s->dram_as, sg_addr, &plen, false,
@@ -218,7 +237,9 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
      } else {
          plen = s->regs[R_HASH_SRC_LEN];
          src = deposit64(src, 0, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC]);
-
+        if (ahc->has_dma64) {
+            src = deposit64(src, 32, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_SRC_HI]);
+        }
          haddr = address_space_map(&s->dram_as, src,
                                    &plen, false, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
          if (haddr == NULL) {
@@ -275,6 +296,9 @@ static void do_hash_operation(AspeedHACEState *s, int algo, 
bool sg_mode,
      }
digest_addr = deposit64(digest_addr, 0, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_DEST]);
+    if (ahc->has_dma64) {
+        digest_addr = deposit64(digest_addr, 32, 32, s->regs[R_HASH_DEST_HI]);
+    }
      if (address_space_write(&s->dram_as, digest_addr,
                              MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
                              digest_buf, digest_len)) {
@@ -601,6 +625,7 @@ static void aspeed_ast2700_hace_class_init(ObjectClass 
*klass, void *data)
       * has completed. It is a temporary workaround.
       */
      ahc->raise_crypt_interrupt_workaround = true;
+    ahc->has_dma64 = true;
  }
static const TypeInfo aspeed_ast2700_hace_info = {


Reply via email to