On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:19 PM Konstantin Shkolnyy <k...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/2025 19:58, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Adding Cindy and Eugenio
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:34 AM Konstantin Shkolnyy <k...@linux.ibm.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I’m observing a problem while testing VDPA with Nvidia ConnectX-6 (mlx5)
> >> on s390.
> >>
> >> Upon start, virtio_net_device_realize() tries to set a new MAC address
> >> by VHOST_VDPA_SET_CONFIG which doesn’t do anything.
> >>
> >> Later, the VM gets started and learns about the old address from
> >> virtio_net_get_config() which returns whatever VHOST_VDPA_GET_CONFIG
> >> returns, unless it's "6 zero bytes", in which case it instead returns
> >> the desired new address (and the problem is avoided).
> >>
> >> Then QEMU again tries to set the new address from vhost_net_start(), now
> >> by calling vhost_vdpa_net_load_cmd(...,VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC,
> >> VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET, ...). This time the new address is
> >> successfully programmed into the NIC, but the VM doesn't know about it.
> >
> > Have you enabled shadow virtqueue? If yes, does it work if you don't do 
> > that?
>
> I only run it in the default configuration, which has SVQ enabled.
>
> >> As it is, the only VDPA scenario that's working for me is:
> >> 1) Avoid specifying the MAC address in the "vdpa dev add" command (which
> >> will create the "6 zero bytes" condition on the first launch).
> >> 2) Keep using the same MAC address for every subsequent VM launch on the
> >> same NIC "virtual function" (so that the old and new addresses are the
> >> same).
> >
> > This is the way we currently use it. Is there any limitation of this?
>
> To be honest, I don't know how severe this limitation is, because I'm
> not a sysadmin. The problem is that I was searching www for info on how
> to setup VDPA and ended up hitting this bug and investigating it.

Exactly, I think we need to improve the documentation anyhow.

> Because the found info sources are variable and some show the address
> specified in "vdpa dev add".
>

Thanks


Reply via email to