Hi, Alistair: I rebase both patches based on the riscv-to-apply.next branch and tested them. https://github.com/alistair23/qemu/tree/riscv-to-apply.next
Only the first patch had two conflicts, which were resolved nicely, and the second patch rebased fine, so you can review it again if necessary, thanks! PATCH v3 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/71f15782-ec28-4763-8197-c10ec1281...@ventanamicro.com/ PATCH v2 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/61e8f7d8-607a-4d63-b9dd-cfbfc8407...@ventanamicro.com/ PATCH v1 review: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/cakmqykpfyxhk8panovzv3fmwxd79wzsjylwkkoagemt_b2k...@mail.gmail.com/ -- Regards, Chao Chao Liu (2): target/riscv: refactor VSTART_CHECK_EARLY_EXIT() to accept vl as a parameter target/riscv: fix handling of nop for vstart >= vl in some vector instruction target/riscv/vcrypto_helper.c | 32 ++++++------- target/riscv/vector_helper.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- target/riscv/vector_internals.c | 4 +- target/riscv/vector_internals.h | 12 ++--- 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) -- 2.48.1