On 26 April 2012 19:10, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > QOM represents logic objects. It's a data model and when we model hardware, > we can model something concrete (because hardware for the most part has a > physical implementation). > > Machines are entirely a QEMU concept.
Not this one again? The real physical beagle board on my desk doesn't look much like a QEMU concept to me... > There's logic in the machines that > will never be able to be expressed in a config file. So? There's logic in a UART model that won't be able to be expressed in a config file, that doesn't constitute an argument for it not being a QOM object. -- PMM
