Currently, the instance_post_init calls are performed from the leaf
class and all the way up to Object.  This is incorrect because the
leaf class cannot observe property values applied by the superclasses;
for example, a compat property will be set on a device *after*
the class's post_init callback has run.

In particular this makes it impossible for implementations of
accel_cpu_instance_init() to operate based on the actual values of
the properties, though it seems that cxl_dsp_instance_post_init and
rp_instance_post_init might have similar issues.

Follow instead the same order as instance_init, starting with Object
and running the child class's instance_post_init after the parent.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
 qom/object.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
index 157a45c5f8b..c03cd3c7339 100644
--- a/qom/object.c
+++ b/qom/object.c
@@ -423,13 +423,13 @@ static void object_init_with_type(Object *obj, TypeImpl 
*ti)
 
 static void object_post_init_with_type(Object *obj, TypeImpl *ti)
 {
-    if (ti->instance_post_init) {
-        ti->instance_post_init(obj);
-    }
-
     if (type_has_parent(ti)) {
         object_post_init_with_type(obj, type_get_parent(ti));
     }
+
+    if (ti->instance_post_init) {
+        ti->instance_post_init(obj);
+    }
 }
 
 bool object_apply_global_props(Object *obj, const GPtrArray *props,
-- 
2.48.1


Reply via email to