On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 13:35, Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 01:06:44PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > We should probably do another fix-capitalization pass on docs/, > > because a bunch more "ARM" uses have crept in since 6fe6d6c9a95. > > I can tack it to v2 of this. I see about 22 occurrences in docs/: > > $> git grep "ARM " | wc -l > 22 > > > (6fe6d6c9a95's commit message says that architecture names like > > "ARMv8" retain all-caps, but I think that was my personal taste > > creeping in -- at any rate the current Arm ARM uses "Armv8", > > "Armv9", etc. It was right that "ARM926" etc should stay all-caps, > > though.) > > Okay, so, architecture names should stick to "Armv8", etc. (I too > would have preferred "ARMv8", but whatever the branding says.) > > For all-caps: I assume you mean these should remain as-is: ARM926EJ-S, > ARM1176JZS, ARM1176, etc.
Yes. (We also have two instances of "ARM64" which isn't an Arm official term at all and should maybe be "AArch64". If we leave it as-is, I have no idea what capitalization to use for it.) thanks -- PMM
