On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 12:25:44PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 19/12/24 19:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 19/12/24 19:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > On 21/11/24 20:21, Peter Xu wrote: > > > > Currently, qdev_get_machine() has a slight misuse on container_get(), as > > > > the helper says "get a container" but in reality the goal is to get the > > > > machine object. It is still a "container" but not strictly. > > > > > > > > Note that it _may_ get a container (at "/machine") in our > > > > current unit test > > > > of test-qdev-global-props.c before all these changes, but it's probably > > > > unexpected and worked by accident. > > > > > > > > Switch to an explicit object_resolve_path_component(), with a > > > > side benefit > > > > that qdev_get_machine() can happen a lot, and we don't need to split the > > > > string ("/machine") every time. This also paves way for making > > > > the helper > > > > container_get() never try to return a non-container at all. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > > > --- > > > > hw/core/qdev.c | 7 ++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/core/qdev.c b/hw/core/qdev.c > > > > index 5f13111b77..b622be15ee 100644 > > > > --- a/hw/core/qdev.c > > > > +++ b/hw/core/qdev.c > > > > @@ -817,7 +817,12 @@ Object *qdev_get_machine(void) > > > > static Object *dev; > > > > if (dev == NULL) { > > > > - dev = container_get(object_get_root(), "/machine"); > > > > + dev = object_resolve_path_component(object_get_root(), > > > > "machine"); > > > > + /* > > > > + * Any call to this function before machine is created > > > > is treated > > > > + * as a programming error as of now. > > > > + */ > > > > + assert(dev); > > > > > > This fails for user-emulation: > > > > > > ./qemu-x86_64 /bin/echo foo > > > qemu-x86_64: ../../hw/core/qdev.c:825: qdev_get_machine: Assertion > > > `dev' failed. > > OK so I guess I might have found a "fix" which is to simply not > call qdev_get_machine() for user emulation, but this involves some > invasive refactoring -- so will take time --.
Thanks for taking a look, Phil. Yes this sounds clean. > > I'm dropping this series for now, planning to merge it again on top > of my refactor once it is ready. Any clever / simpler fix is > obviously welcomed first. I initially thought about this, which could also be clean but I then noticed LINUX_USER is poisoned.. ===8<=== diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c index 58897a79a7..da26e8d69b 100644 --- a/qom/object.c +++ b/qom/object.c @@ -1729,7 +1729,19 @@ const char *object_property_get_type(Object *obj, const char *name, Error **errp return prop->type; } +/* + * Create all QEMU default containers. + * + * For system emulations, "machine" and its sub-containers are only created + * when machine initializes (qemu_create_machine()). + * + * For user emulations, create "machine" before hand to make qdev realize() + * work by default. + */ static const char *const root_containers[] = { +#ifdef CONFIG_LINUX_USER + "machine", +#endif "chardevs", "objects", "backend" @@ -1740,10 +1752,6 @@ static Object *object_root_initialize(void) Object *root = object_new(TYPE_CONTAINER); int i; - /* - * Create all QEMU system containers. "machine" and its sub-containers - * are only created when machine initializes (qemu_create_machine()). - */ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(root_containers); i++) { object_property_add_new_container(root, root_containers[i]); } ===8<=== Maybe we could still move it somewhere that LINUX_USER is not poisoned (plus "unattached" be created too, more below)? OTOH, this works for me: ===8<=== diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c index b09af8d436..009b7695f2 100644 --- a/linux-user/main.c +++ b/linux-user/main.c @@ -819,6 +819,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) set_preferred_target_page_bits(ctz32(host_page_size)); finalize_target_page_bits(); + Object *fake_obj = object_property_add_new_container(object_get_root(), + "machine"); + object_property_add_new_container(fake_obj, "unattached"); + cpu = cpu_create(cpu_type); env = cpu_env(cpu); cpu_reset(cpu); ===8<=== So we need both "/machine" and "/machine/unattached" so far to make linux-user work. Not sure if bsd-user/main.c needs similar care, but none of these look as clean. Thanks, -- Peter Xu