On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 at 15:10, Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > > W dniu 5.12.2024 o 15:53, Peter Maydell pisze: > >> This is sbsa-ref not sbc-ref. Let it just have that 2GB of ram. > >> None of existing SBSA systems comes with such low amount. > > > Yes, I think I agree here. Changing the default RAM size based on > > whether the CPU does or does not have a particular feature is > > unusual and not something we do on other board types, and it > > definitely doesn't match the general intention that sbsa-ref is a > > "looks like real hardware" machine. > > > > The problem with using 2GB, though, is that it doesn't work on 32- > > bit hosts, which have a max of 2047MB (and > > Do we do CI on 32-bit hosts?
We do at least some. In particular the qom-test tests run by 'make check' include "start every machine in its default configuration and check it doesn't fall over". This will fail for a machine that defaults to 2GB RAM on a 32-bit host. > RME tests (queued to testing/next by Alex) already use 2GB so in such > environment we would have failure anyway. I think we probably don't run the 'check-functional' tests on 32-bit hosts. -- PMM
