Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > On 21/11/2024 18.31, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> >>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 16:58, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is a mostly testing focused set of patches but a few bug fixes as >>>> well. I plan to send the PR in on Monday. I can drop any patches that >>>> are objected to but I think its pretty safe. >>>> >>>> Contains: >>>> >>>> - Daniel's clean-up of functional tests >>>> - Another avocado->function conversion from Thomas >>>> - Update the tuxrun baseline images >>>> - Minor fix to the rust pl011 device >>>> - Documentation clarification on identity >>> >>> Should we really be updating the tuxrun baseline images >>> in the middle of a release freeze period? Unless the old images >>> are going to go away and break the tests, I think it would >>> be better to stick with what we're currently testing. >> Well the arm64be fixed a real problem and while I was at it I >> figured >> might as well keep the rest in sync. I have tested them so they all pass >> (although I'm waiting on the CI run now). > > But there could be new intermittent problems in the new images ... so > if we'd face such a problem, we would not know whether it is the image > or whether it is QEMU. Thus maybe let's better keep the old versions > for 9.2 (except for the arm64 patch that fixes a real problem), and > use the new versions for 10.0 ?
Fair enough. Will drop the others for now. > > Thomas -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
