On 21/11/2024 20.03, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Alex,

On 11/21/24 17:57, Alex Bennée wrote:
This is a mostly testing focused set of patches but a few bug fixes as
well. I plan to send the PR in on Monday. I can drop any patches that
are objected to but I think its pretty safe.

Contains:

   - Daniel's clean-up of functional tests
   - Another avocado->function conversion from Thomas
   - Update the tuxrun baseline images
   - Minor fix to the rust pl011 device
   - Documentation clarification on identity

The following could do with some review:

   tests/functional: update the x86_64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the sparc64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the s390x tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the riscv64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the riscv32 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the ppc64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the ppc32 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the mips64el tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the mips64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the mips32el tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the mips32 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: add a m68k tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the i386 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the aarch64 tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: update the arm tuxrun tests
   tests/functional: Convert the Avocado aarch64 tuxrun tests

Do you think we could include patches 2-4 from this series ?

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241112130246.970281-1-...@redhat.com/

Only patch 3 lacks a R-b.

I had a question on patch 3 and a suggestion on patch 4 ... could you maybe address them first? Thanks!

 Thomas


Reply via email to