This series fixes several problems I ran into while trying to simulate
the AMD/Xilinx Versal CANFD controller in the xlnx-versal-virt machine
using Xilinx's v6.6_LTS_2024.1 kernel. With all of these patches
applied, everything works correctly alongside actual CAN devices.

- IRQs were accidentally not being delivered due to having a level other
  than 1. The IRQ count in /proc/interrupts in Linux was stuck at 0.
- Incoming CAN FD frames were being treated as non-FD.
- The CAN IDs were garbled in both RX and TX directions.
- The ESI and BRS flags were not being handled.
- The byte ordering was wrong in the data in both directions.
- Incoming CAN FD frames with DLC = 1-7 weren't handled correctly.
- The FIFO read_index and store_index wrapping logic was incorrect.

I don't have any actual Versal hardware to compare behavior against, but
with these changes, it plays nicely with SocketCAN on the host system.

Changes in v2:
- Added handling of ESI and BRS flags, ensured frame->flags is initialized
- Switched to use common can_dlc2len() and can_len2dlc() functions
- Added fix for FIFO wrapping problems I observed during stress testing

Doug Brown (7):
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Fix interrupt level
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Fix CAN FD flag check
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Translate CAN ID registers
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Handle flags correctly
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Fix byte ordering
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Simplify DLC conversions
  hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Fix FIFO issues

 hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c | 173 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to