On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 21:06 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 15:22, Christian Borntraeger > <borntrae...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Am 13.08.24 um 18:52 schrieb Peter Maydell: > > > The main aim of this patchseries is to remove the two remaining uses > > > of device_class_set_parent_reset() in the tree, which are virtio-ccw > > > and the s390 CPU class. Doing that lets us do some followup cleanup. > > > (The diffstat looks alarming but is almost all coccinelle automated > > > changes.) > > > > > > Note that my testing here has only been "make check" and > > > "make check-avocado", which I know doesn't really exercise reset > > > very heavily. > > > Nina, can you have a look at those patches? > > If you plan to do any testing you'll want to locally fix the > silly mistake I made in patch 2 (a RESET_TYPE_COLD where > it should say RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL) -- see the review > comments on that patch. Sorry about that one... > > thanks > -- PMM >
I'll run it through our CI and see if anything pops up.
