On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 15:22, Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Am 13.08.24 um 18:52 schrieb Peter Maydell: > > The main aim of this patchseries is to remove the two remaining uses > > of device_class_set_parent_reset() in the tree, which are virtio-ccw > > and the s390 CPU class. Doing that lets us do some followup cleanup. > > (The diffstat looks alarming but is almost all coccinelle automated > > changes.) > > > > Note that my testing here has only been "make check" and > > "make check-avocado", which I know doesn't really exercise reset > > very heavily.
> Nina, can you have a look at those patches? If you plan to do any testing you'll want to locally fix the silly mistake I made in patch 2 (a RESET_TYPE_COLD where it should say RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL) -- see the review comments on that patch. Sorry about that one... thanks -- PMM
