Avihai Horon <avih...@nvidia.com> writes: > On 31/07/2024 8:12, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments >> >> >> Avihai Horon <avih...@nvidia.com> writes: >> >>> On 30/07/2024 15:22, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> Avihai, there's a question for you on VfioMigrationState. >>>> >>>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> [...] >> >>>> * VfioMigrationState >>>> >>>> Can't see why this one has a prefix. Avihai, can you enlighten me? >>> >>> linux-headers/linux/vfio.h defines enum vfio_device_mig_state with values >>> VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP etc. >> >> It does not define any VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_*, though. >> >>> I used the QAPI prefix to emphasize this is a QAPI entity rather than a >>> VFIO entity. >> >> We define about two dozen symbols starting with VFIO_, and several >> hundreds starting with vfio_. What makes this enumeration type >> different so its members need emphasis? > > Right. I thought it would be clearer with the QAPI prefix because > VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_* and VFIO_MIGRATION_STATE_* have similar values. > > But it's not a must. If you want to reduce prefix usage, go ahead, I don't > have a strong opinion about it.
Thanks!
