On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:02:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:03:43 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:38:39 +0530 > > > Sunil V L <suni...@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > > > > > > As per the step 5 in the process documented in bios-tables-test.c, > > > > generate the expected ACPI AML data files for RISC-V using the > > > > rebuild-expected-aml.sh script and update the > > > > bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h. > > > > > > > > These are all new files being added for the first time. Hence, iASL diff > > > > output is not added. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <suni...@ventanamicro.com> > > > > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> > > > > Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > > > > > > Michael, > > > can it go via risc-v tree or > > > do you plan to merge it via your tree? > > > > given patch 1 is merged, I took the rest. > > Looks like your CI runs are catching this as well but > RHCT here is failing. I rebased the GI/GP set on top of this > and ignored that failure by skipping riscv64 tests. > > Jonathan > Hi Jonathan, Michael,
Looks like a recent RISC-V PR updated the rva22s64 ISA string affecting the RHCT I had in my series. I see that Michael dropped those 3 RISC-V patches from the PR. So, let me update the expected RHCT AML file in a new series. I will also include Igor's feedback to remove fallback path in that series. Thanks, Sunil Thanks, Sunil
